Preferential Gifts in Islamic Law: A Critical Analysis of Hiba Tafzili and Its Impact on Women’s Right to Inheritance in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67101/alamir.v5i03.187Keywords:
Preferential Gifts, Hiba Tafzili, Women’s Right to Inheritance, Legal System of PakistanAbstract
This research paper critically evaluates the notion of Hiba Tafzili, or preferential gift, in the domain of Islamic law and its consequences on women's right to inheritance within the domain of Pakistani law. It explores the basic Islamic values like fairness, justice, etc., together with the respect of rights of men and women versed particularly in inheritance. While this is the teaching of Islam, the general view is that Hiba Tafzili is used as a tool for the alienation of women from their ancestral properties and that it really is a notion and practice that promotes economic injustice. The paper discourses exactly on the concepts and categories of Hiba with divergent views of many jurists regarding the meaning of Hiba on behalf of one heir rather than the others. The pertinent case laws from both Pakistan courts, which exhibit the dichotomy in judicial interpretation voicing validations regarding the preferential gifts on one side, and nullification on the other, underscore the tension between legal permissibility and moral considerations. It appeals for a new legal position about Hiba Tafzili within Pakistan, which in turn would serve the interest of women and equitable distribution of property requirements based on the spirit of Islamic law, as well as recommend changes consistent with fairer interpretations of Islamic law than those that currently exist.
Views & Downloads Stats:
References
Zafar Iqbal Kalanauri, Hibah (Gift) in Pakistan in the Light of Shariʿah, accessed October 20, 2024.
Wahbah al-Zuḥaylī, Financial Transactions in Islamic Jurisprudence, trans. Mahmoud A. El-Gamal, rev. Muhammad S. Eissa (Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 2001), vol. 1, p. 539.
Syed Ameer Ali, The Law Relating to Gifts, Trusts, and Testamentary Dispositions Among the Mahommedans (Calcutta: Thacker, Spink, 1885), p. 46.
Waheedullah Ḥusainī Qādrī Multānī, A Brief Study on Islamic Law of Gift (Hibah), accessed October 25, 2024.
Fazal Khalique and Aziz Ahmad, “The Gift of Usufruct in Favor of Wife,” Islamic Law Review 1, no. 3, art. 4.
Tanzeel ur Rehman, Majmoaʿ-e-Qawānīn-e-Islāmī (Islamabad: Islamic Research Institute, International Islamic University, 2021), vol. 4, p. 954.
Tabrez Ahmad, “Comparative Study of Gift under Islamic Law and Transfer of Property Law: Indian Perspective,” SSRN Electronic Paper, accessed October 28, 2024.
Wizārah al-Awqāf wa al-Shuʾūn al-Islāmiyyah, al-Mawsūʿah al-Fiqhiyyah (Kuwait: Dār al-Ṣafwah, 1998), vol. 26, p. 323.
Munir Ahmad Mughal, “Islamic Concept of Lending (al-ʿĀriyah),” SSRN, April 3, 2012.
Abū Zakariyyā Yaḥyā ibn Sharaf al-Nawawī, Minhāj al-Ṭālibīn (Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, n.d.), p. 171.
Hans Wehr, A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic, 4th ed. (New York: Spoken Language Services, 1994), p. 820.
Rehman, Majmoaʿ-e-Qawānīn-e-Islāmī, vol. 4, p. 954.
M. E. Haque, “Gender Bias ‘Preferential Gift’ is Illegal: New Interpretation,” Dhaka University Law Journal 25, no. 1 (2014).
Inam Ullah, Depriving Daughters of Inheritance Rights through Hiba: A Shariah Perspective (Islamabad: Council of Islamic Ideology, 2022–23), p. 57.
Transparency International, “Pakistan: Empowering Women through Access to Justice,” July 25, 2023, accessed November 24, 2024.
Kamran Ali, “Khyber Pakhtunkhwa: 90% of Women Deprived of Inheritance,” Aaj News, September 23, 2023.
Munazza Hameed, “The Women Inheritance Paradox in Pakistan: Faith vs Family,” Modern Diplomacy, September 20, 2024.
Umar Bacha, “Passing Inheritance Down through Men Is an Old Practice,” Dawn, March 5, 2022.
Iram Rubab, Women’s Right of Inheritance: Practices and Challenges in Punjab (PhD diss., University of the Punjab, Lahore, 2019).
Abū Dāwūd Sulaymān ibn al-Ashʿath, Sunan Abī Dāwūd, Kitāb al-Aqḍiyah, ḥadīth no. 3544 (Riyadh: Dārussalām, 2008), vol. 4, p. 159.
Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, Kitāb al-Hibāt, ḥadīth no. 2586 (Riyadh: Dārussalām, 1997), vol. 3, p. 438.
Al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, vol. 3, p. 438.
Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī, Fatḥ al-Bārī bi-Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī (Cairo: Dār Ṭaybah, 2005), vol. 6, p. 436.
Haque, “Gender Bias ‘Preferential Gift’ is Illegal.”
Rehman, Majmoaʿ-e-Qawānīn-e-Islāmī, vol. 4, pp. 963–964.
Rehman, Majmoaʿ-e-Qawānīn-e-Islāmī, vol. 4, p. 963.
Ibid.
Al-Kāsānī, Badāʾiʿ al-Ṣanāʾiʿ (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2003), vol. 8, p. 115.
Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī, Fatḥ al-Bārī, vol. 6, p. 436.
Al-Shaʿrānī, al-Mīzān al-Kubrā (Cairo: Dār al-Taqwā, 2022), vol. 3, p. 95.
Ibn Rushd, Bidāyat al-Mujtahid (Cairo: Maktabah Ibn Taymiyyah, 1415 AH), vol. 4, p. 160.
Al-Kāsānī, Badāʾiʿ al-Ṣanāʾiʿ, vol. 8, p. 92.
Ibrāhīm al-Fayrūzābādī, al-Muhadhdhab (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1995), vol. 2, p. 333.
Majd al-Dīn Ibn Taymiyyah, al-Muḥarrar fī al-Fiqh, vol. 1, p. 374.
Sharaf al-Dīn al-Maqdisī, al-Iqnāʿ, vol. 3, pp. 34–35.
Najm al-Dīn al-Ḥillī, Sharāʾiʿ al-Islām (Beirut: Dār al-Kārī, 2004), vol. 1, p. 472.
Ibn Ḥazm, al-Muḥallā (Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 2016), vol. 11, p. 177.
Transfer of Property Act, 1872, sec. 122.
Babu Lal v. Ghansham Das, ILR 44 All. 633 (1922), pp. 633–634.
Transfer of Property Act, 1872, sec. 129.
Civil Petition No. 1647 of 2018.
Siraj Din v. Mst Jamilan, PLD 1997 Lahore 633.
Muhammad Saeed v. Muhammad Siddique, 2010 MLD 855.
Malik Ghulam Akbar Khan v. Al-Haaj Abdul Raziq Khan, 2011 CLC 1734.
Nisar Ahmad v. Muhammad Anwar, 2022 MLD 85.
Mst Nusrat Zohra v. Mst Azhra Bibi, PLD 2006 SC 15.
Shariat Petition No. 6/L of 2000.
Mst Kamalan Bibi v. Province of Punjab, 2022 CLC 890.
Muhammad Yar v. Bibi Gul Seema, 2023 CLC 433.
Mst Rasoolan Bibi v. Province of Punjab, 2023 CLC 1171.
Abdul Nasir v. Bibi Hajira, 2023 CLC 1391.
Barkat Ali v. Muhammad Ismail, 2002 SCMR 1938.
Islam-ud-Din v. Mst Noor Jahan, 2016 SCMR 986.
Allah Ditta v. Manak alias Muhammad Siddique, 2017 SCMR 402.
Shabla v. Jahan Afroz Khilat, 2020 SCMR 352.
Farhan Aslam v. Mst Nuzba Shaheen, 2021 SCMR 179.
Bashir Ahmad Anjum v. Muhammad Raffique, 2021 SCMR 772.
Mst Parveen v. Muhammad Pervaiz, 2022 SCMR 64.
Tahsinullah v. Mst Parveen, 2022 SCMR 346.
Muhammad Rafiq v. Mst Ghulam Zoharan Mai, 2023 SCMR 988.
Babar Anwar v. Muhammad Ashraf, 2024 SCMR 734.
Khallid Hussain v. Nazir Ahmad, Civil Appeal No. 1-L of 2012.
Faqir Ali v. Sakina Bibi, PLD 2022 SC 85.
Abdul Aziz v. Mst Zaib-un-Nissa, PLD 2022 SC 504.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mr. Shahir Hadi, Dr. Muhammad Akbar Khan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
