An Analytical study of the "Fath-ur-Rehman Fi Ithbāt-e-Madhab al-Naumān

فتح الرحمٰن فی اثبات مذہب النعمان''کا تحقیقی و تجزیاتی مطالعہ

Authors

  • Muhammad Nawaz Ph.D Research Scholar, Dept. of Islamic Studies, Allama Iqbal Open University
  • Hafiz Fareed ud din Ph.D Research Scholar, Dept. of Islamic Studies, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67101/alamir.v2i02.28

Keywords:

Hadith, Imam Abu Hanifa, Hanfi School of Thought, Shaykh Abdul Haq, Fath-ur-Rehman

Abstract

In "Fath-ur-Rehman Fi Ithbāt-e-Madhab al-Naumān", Shaykh Abdul Haq Muhaddith Dehalvi collected Ahadith supporting the religion and sect of Imam Abu Hanifa (R.A) and described the differences of the jurists and gave preference to Hanafi School of thought. He has proved through this book that Imam’s sect is in accordance with the Sahih Ahadith and while removing the accusations leveled against Imam Abu Hanifa, he declared that these are the issues on which the contrariness of the hadith was accused but irony of the situation is that Abu Hanifa (R.A) is following the hadith while other jurists explicitly base their intellect and conjecture and the style of the book shows that Abu Hanifa (R.A) is the absolute doer of hadith and Imam Shafi (R.A) uses conjecture and opinion. Moreover, Author speaks on the authenticity of the hadiths which not only support him but also give comfort and consolation to the opposing party. This great book of Hazrat Shaykh Muhaddith (R.A) is unique and unique in its importance, infrequency, style of reasoning, research issues, preference of religion, and hadiths supporting Hazrat Imam Azam Abu Hanifa (R.A) which opens new chapters of coming research. In the said article, an analytical study of his book "Fath-ur-Rehman fi Asbat-e-Madhhab-e-Noman" will be presented which will expose the reality of Imam Abu Hanifa's accusation of being against the hadith and this great effort of Sheikh Abdul Haq will also be brought to light.

Views & Downloads Stats:

Stats are being updated.

References

Sheikh ʿAbd al-Ḥaq Muḥaddith Dehlvī, Akhbār al-Akhyār maʿa Maktūbāt (Sakhar: Maktabah Nūriyyah Raẓawiyyah, n.d.), p. 310.

Syed ʿAbd al-Ḥayy ibn Fakhr al-Dīn Ḥasanī, Al-Iʿlām biman fī Tārīkh al-Hind min al-Aʿlām (Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 1420 AH), 5:554.

Shāh ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Muḥaddith Dehlvī, Fawāʾid Jāmiʿah bar ʿUjālah Nāfiʿah, trans. ʿAbd al-Ḥalīm Chishtī (Karachi: Mīr Muḥammad Kutub Khānah, n.d.), p. 14.

Ḥasanī, Al-Iʿlām, 5:554.

Dehlvī, Akhbār al-Akhyār maʿa Maktūbāt, p. 271.

ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz, Fawāʾid Jāmiʿah bar ʿUjālah Nāfiʿah, p. 14.

Ḥasanī, Nuzhat al-Khawāṭir, 5:554.

ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz, Fawāʾid Jāmiʿah bar ʿUjālah Nāfiʿah, p. 14.

Khalīq Aḥmad Niẓāmī, Ḥayāt Sheikh ʿAbd al-Ḥaq Muḥaddith Dehlvī (Lahore: Maktabah Raḥmāniyyah, n.d.), p. 43.

ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz, Fawāʾid Jāmiʿah bar ʿUjālah Nāfiʿah, p. 48.

Sheikh ʿAbd al-Ḥaq Muḥaddith Dehlvī, Fatḥ al-Raḥmān fī Ithbāt Madhhab al-Nuʿmān (Multan: ʿAtīq Academy, n.d.), 1:29.

Dehlvī, Fatḥ al-Raḥmān, 3:387.

Dehlvī, Fatḥ al-Raḥmān, 1:21.

Dehlvī, Fatḥ al-Raḥmān, 1:21.

Muḥammad Shafīʿ, Al-Munjid (Karachi: Dār al-Ishāʿat, 1974), p. 417.

Shihāb al-Dīn Aḥmad ibn Ḥajar al-Makkī, Al-Khayrāt al-Ḥisān, trans. Ẓafar al-Dīn Bahārī (Turkey: Maktabah al-Ḥaqīqah, 1422 AH), pp. 48–49.

Shiblī Nuʿmānī, Sīrat al-Nabī (Āgrah: Maṭbaʿ Mufīd-e-ʿĀm, 1893), p. 20.

ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz, Fawāʾid Jāmiʿah bar ʿUjālah Nāfiʿah, pp. 42–43.

ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz, Fawāʾid Jāmiʿah bar ʿUjālah Nāfiʿah, p. 48.

ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz, Fawāʾid Jāmiʿah bar ʿUjālah Nāfiʿah, p. 48.

Niẓāmī, Ḥayāt Sheikh ʿAbd al-Ḥaq Muḥaddith Dehlvī, p. 176.

Dehlvī, Fatḥ al-Raḥmān, 3:389.

Dehlvī, Fatḥ al-Raḥmān, 2:186.

Niẓāmī, Ḥayāt Sheikh ʿAbd al-Ḥaq Muḥaddith Dehlvī, p. 174.

Syed ʿAbd al-Ḥayy ibn Fakhr al-Dīn Ḥasanī, Al-Thaqāfah al-Islāmiyyah fī al-Hind (Damascus: Majmaʿ al-Lughah al-ʿArabiyyah, 1993), p. 112.

Syed ʿAbd al-Ḥayy ibn Fakhr al-Dīn Ḥasanī, Al-Iʿlām biman fī Tārīkh al-Hind min al-Aʿlām al-Musammā bi Nuzhat al-Khawāṭir wa Bahjat al-Masāmiʿ wa al-Nawāẓir (Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 1420 AH), 5:557.

ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz, Fawāʾid Jāmiʿah bar ʿUjālah Nāfiʿah, p. 48.

Niẓāmī, Ḥayāt Sheikh ʿAbd al-Ḥaq Muḥaddith Dehlvī, p. 174.

Dehlvī, Fatḥ al-Raḥmān, 3:287.

Niẓāmī, Ḥayāt Sheikh ʿAbd al-Ḥaq Muḥaddith Dehlvī, p. 262.

Dehlvī, Fatḥ al-Raḥmān, 3:387.

Nawāb Ṣiddīq Ḥasan Khān Qannūjī, Al-Ḥiṭṭah fī Dhikr al-Ṣiḥāḥ al-Sittah (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1905), p. 239.

Qannūjī, Al-Ḥiṭṭah, pp. 120, 239.

Qannūjī, Al-Ḥiṭṭah, p. 239.

Dehlvī, Fatḥ al-Raḥmān, 1:27.

Muḥammad Muḥy al-Dīn, Taʾyīd Madhhab-e-Ḥanafī (Urdu translation of Fatḥ al-Raḥmān) (Lahore: Farīd Book Stall, 2000), pp. 15–16.

Dehlvī, Fatḥ al-Raḥmān, 1:29.

Dehlvī, Fatḥ al-Raḥmān, 1:117.

ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz, Fawāʾid Jāmiʿah bar ʿUjālah Nāfiʿah, p. 48.

Dehlvī, Fatḥ al-Raḥmān, 1:120.

Muḥy al-Dīn, Taʾyīd Madhhab-e-Ḥanafī, p. 323.

Dehlvī, Fatḥ al-Raḥmān, 1:248.

Dehlvī, Fatḥ al-Raḥmān, 1:196.

Dehlvī, Fatḥ al-Raḥmān, 1:168.

Muḥy al-Dīn, Taʾyīd Madhhab-e-Ḥanafī, p. 239.

Muḥy al-Dīn, Taʾyīd Madhhab-e-Ḥanafī, p. 325.

Dehlvī, Fatḥ al-Raḥmān, 1:249.

Dehlvī, Fatḥ al-Raḥmān, 2:267.

Muḥammad Saʿīd, Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Ḥakīm, and Muḥammad Khān Qādrī, Sharḥ Mishkāt: Tarjumah Ashʿat al-Lamaʿāt (Lahore: Farīd Book Stall, 2001), 2:395–396.

Muḥammad Saʿīd, Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Ḥakīm, and Muḥammad Khān Qādrī, Sharḥ Mishkāt: Tarjumah Ashʿat al-Lamaʿāt, 2:397.

Sheikh ʿAbd al-Ḥaq Muḥaddith Dehlvī, Ashʿat al-Lamaʿāt (Bombay: Kārkhānah Muḥammadī, 1277 AH), 1:233.

Dehlvī, Fatḥ al-Raḥmān, 1:26.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Nawaz, M., & Fareed ud din, H. (2021). An Analytical study of the "Fath-ur-Rehman Fi Ithbāt-e-Madhab al-Naumān: فتح الرحمٰن فی اثبات مذہب النعمان’’کا تحقیقی و تجزیاتی مطالعہ. Al-Amīr Research Journal for Islamic Studies, 2(02), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.67101/alamir.v2i02.28