Process of Paradigm Shift in Determining Modes of Orientalist’s confrontations in Sirah writing: An Analytical Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67101/alamir.v4i03.74Keywords:
Paradigm shift, Sirah writing, Orientalist’s confrontation, winning factors of reconciliation, Academic discourse for IslamAbstract
The research paper grew out on the process of Paradigm shift which plays significant role in formative modes of the orientalists’ preconception and intolerance which they accomplished while inscription on purified lifetime of Muhammad (amity and greetings be upon him) but these confrontations shift its development to resolution and reconciliation by Western authors of 21st century that lead to winning factors in academic treatise of current era. The research aims to search determining modes of them, thought process of paradigm shift and its impacts. The present threads will explore modes that stimulate them to discover the Islamic inclinations over the sacred life of him. In their exposition, they have shown enthusiastic determinations to understand the observation that expands the Islamic acquaintances and articulated it in their dialectal with their patterns. The intolerance took place in academic and speculative jurisdiction of European Revival. In 21st century, number of Western authors reconciled their thoughts and interpretations for Islam.
Views & Downloads Stats:
References
Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (London: University of Chicago Press, 1962), p. 157.
Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, p. 158.
Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, p. 12.
Ken Wilber, Sex, Ecology, and Spirituality: The Spirit of Evolution (Libgen PDF edition), p. 383.
Michael Friedman, Dynamics of Reason: The 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University (Stanford, California: CSLI Publications, 1947), p. 60.
Fritjof Capra, The Turning Point: Science, Society, and the Rising Culture (New York: Bantam Simon & Schuster, 1988), p. 14.
James A. Marcum, Thomas Kuhn’s Revolution: An Historical Philosophy of Science (London: Continuum, 2005), p. 19.
Wes Sharrock, Kuhn: Philosopher of Scientific Revolution (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002), p. 4.
Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, p. 109.
Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species (London: Pickering & Chatto Publishing, 1995), pp. 65–70.
Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, p. 48.
Al-Qurʾān, 2:120.
Al-Qurʾān, 3:11.
Al-Qurʾān, 3:100–101.
Zafer Ali Qureshi, The Prophet Muhammad and His Western Critics (Lahore: Idārah Maʿārif-i-Islāmī, 1992), vol. 1, p. 2.
R. W. Southern, Western Views of Islam in the Middle Ages (London: Cambridge University Press, 1962), p. 57.
Edward Said, Orientalism (London: Penguin Books, 2003), p. 56.
Kenneth Boulding, Conflict and Defense: A General Theory (America: University Press of America, 1962), p. 5.
Ho-Won Jeong, Understanding Conflict and Conflict Analysis (London: Sage Publications, 2008), p. 19.
Roland Lardinois, “Orientalism in Early Modern France: Eurasian Trade, Exoticism, and the Ancient Regime,” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 52, no. 2 (2009): 335.
Hichem Djaït, Europe and Islam (London: University of California Press, 1985), p. 98.
Said, Orientalism, p. 49.
E. Natalie Rothman, The Dragoman Renaissance: Diplomatic Interpreters and the Routes of Orientalism (New York: Cornell University Press, 2021), p. 14.
Michael Curtis, European Thinkers on Oriental Despotism in the Middle East and India (London: Cambridge University Press), p. 31.
Rothman, The Dragoman Renaissance, p. 14.
Frederick Quinn, The Sum of All Heresies: The Image of Islam in Western Thought (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 62.
Piyel Haldar, Law, Orientalism and Postcolonialism: The Jurisdiction of the Lotus-Eaters (London: Routledge Cavendish, 2008), p. 149.
Robert J. C. Young, Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001).
Ann Laura Stoler, Race and the Education of Desire: Foucault’s History of Sexuality and the Colonial Order of Things (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1996).
The English Renaissance, Orientalism and the Idea of Asia (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), p. 4.
Rothman, The Dragoman Renaissance, p. i.
“The Conflict Paradigm in Sociology and the Study of Social Conflict,” accessed July 20, 2020.
Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, p. 57.
Dennis J. D. Sandole and Sean Byrne (eds.), Handbook of Conflict Analysis and Resolution (London: Routledge Taylor & Francis, 2009), p. 203.
Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, p. 42.
Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, p. 10.
Peter P. J. Driessen and Pieter Glasbergen (eds.), Greening Society: The Paradigm Shift in Dutch Environmental Politics (Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media, 2002).
Richard J. Bernstein, Beyond Objectivism and Relativism (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press), p. 90.
Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, p. 123.
Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, p. 130.
Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, pp. 123–144.
Christopher Allen, Islamophobia (London: Ashgate Publishing), pp. 30–31.
Nabil Matar, Europe Through Arab Eyes (New York: Columbia University Press, 2009), p. 93.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nayab Ruby, Muhammad Naimat Ullah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
